Free 2-Page Quick Reference

After US v. Heppner: Your Options for AI That Can't Be Subpoenaed

A federal judge ruled in 2026 that AI conversations have no legal protection. This guide covers your three options for AI use that keeps sensitive conversations truly private.

Plain-English explanation of the US v. Heppner ruling and who it actually affects
Three options: enterprise zero-retention, local AI, and self-hosted — with costs
Quick decision guide: which option for your situation (solo freelancer vs team vs casual use)
Google Gemma 4 on iPhone as the free local AI option — zero cost, zero server records

Get Instant Access

After the US v. Heppner ruling on AI chat privilege, a guide to your three options for private AI — enterprise plans, local models, and self-hosted infrastructure.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

What’s Inside

In 2026, Judge Rakoff (S.D.N.Y.) ruled in US v. Heppner that conversations with AI tools are not protected by attorney-client privilege and can be subpoenaed. This guide explains what that means in practice — and what your options are if you discuss sensitive information in AI tools.

You’ll get:

Who This Is For

Business owners, consultants, lawyers, real estate agents, healthcare providers, and anyone who discusses client work, deals, disputes, or confidential strategy in AI tools. For casual personal use — writing help, cooking questions — this ruling almost certainly doesn’t affect you.

The guide is honest about this: most people don’t need to change anything. But if you fall into the category that does, this tells you exactly what to do.

The Simple Version

If your AI conversations appeared in court, would you be comfortable? If yes, keep using what you’re using. If no, pick one of the three options in this guide. The free option (Gemma 4 local) takes 10 minutes to set up.